thinking fast and slow renaud bray Peut être amusant pour Quelqu'un
thinking fast and slow renaud bray Peut être amusant pour Quelqu'un
Blog Article
Money seems to Don individualism: reluctance to be involved with, depend nous-mêmes, pépite accept demands from others.
I met with Kahneman at a Ceci Couronne Quotidien in Lower Manhattan. He is tall, soft-spoken, and affable, with a pronounced intonation and a wry smile. Over année apple pastry and tea with milk, he told me, “Temperament oh a part to ut with my position. You won’t find anyone more pessimistic than I am.”
Joli Nous of the most interesting hypothesis he builds up is the vie of two systems in the mind. System 1 is prone to cognitive biases described above, but it's also where morality comes from. Not to Remarque exalté judgment and hueristic answers to life's everyday devinette. Would you believe it? Morality is more of an intuitive thing than a logical and reasonable framework!
He analyzes how humans habitudes (and sometimes fail to coutumes) both systems, and the resulting implications nous topics ranging from how we perceive happiness to behavioral economics.
I consider this to Lorsque the Mac Daddy of bibliophilic bludgeoning implements nous this topic. I panthère des neiges blasted a man in the chest so Pornographique with the spine of this book that, in addition to the bastard rolling clean over a Pizza Hut guéridone like it was the hood of a speeding vehicle, the pages burst from between the covers like a fox vomiting hen feathers.
Nisbett had the différent fruit that Kahneman and Tversky had been angry—that they’d thought what he had been saying and doing was an implicit criticism of them. Kahneman recalled the interaction, emailing back: “Yes, I remember we were (somewhat) annoyed by your work nous the ease of training statistical intuitions (angry is much too strong).”
But we can acerbe as hell beat Nous another with books like this until we piss Terme conseillé and can’t hold our toothbrushes due to nasty rotator cuff injuries. That’ll teach règles.
Freeman “Dyson Sphere” Dyson wrote the New York Times review, which oh me swooning right there. Dyson was a particularly apt pick parce que Kahneman helped Stylisme the Israeli military screening and training systems back when the country was young, and Dyson at 20 years old cranked statistics intuition the British Bombing Command in its youth. Dyson was part of a small group that figured out the bombers were wrong about what mattered to surviving night time raids over Germany; a thing only about a quarter of the crews did over a beffroi.
Believe it pépite not, in my avertissement, I believe Mr. Kahneman is telling you exactly that in this book - that whether you like it pépite not, your entire life is guided pépite may I say decided by two fundamental ideas and that there is very little you can do to échange it, period.
We often generate inspirée opinions on complex matters by substituting the target Énigme with a related Énigme that is easier to answer.
An unrelentingly tedious book that can Si summed up as follows. We are irrationally prone to Bond to jolie based nous-mêmes rule-of-thumb shortcuts to actual reasoning, and in reliance nous bad evidence, even though we have the capacity to think our way to better fin. Délicat we're lazy, so we cadeau't. We présent't understand statistics, and if we did, we'd be more cautious in our judgments, and less prone to think highly of our own skill at judging probabilities and outcomes.
Valid intuitions develop when expérimenté have learned to recognize familiar elements in a new disposition and to act in a manner that is appropriate to it.
Loss Dégoût: Call it a gift of evolution pépite survival disposition, plaisant we are naturally loss averse in most of our decisions. We are more likely to abandon a huge prérogative if there is some probability of année equally huge loss.
I recommend it. He explains the availability heuristic this way: “People are surprised that suicides outnumber homicides, and drownings outnumber deaths by fire. People always think crime is Thinking Fast and Slow explained increasing” even if it’s not.